Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

[photo-3d] R: Digital Video 3D


  • From: "sergio baldissara" <bobongo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [photo-3d] R: Digital Video 3D
  • Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 00:40:54 -0000

I tried direct anaglyphs with the Korean clone too, but my video 
camera automatic corrected colours in an ugly way; my attachment 
shows vertical mis-alignement, but even if it was ok, IMO the results 
would have been unsactisfactory. you can see a frame (43k) in  
http://it.egroups.com/message/scpf/8.
But my friend Giorgio Bogoni successfully splits NuView videos by 
computer and I easily turned one of them into anaglyph format
http://it.egroups.com/files/holostereoitalia/bacheca/side%20by%20side/
He did the same thing and he liked his results, but he warned me his 
anaglyph videos turn unwatchable in TV (at least in our PAL format)
Sergio

--- In photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Gabriel Jacob" <gjacob@xxxx> wrote:
> Marcus Warrington writes:
> >I think someone else mentioned that it should also be possible to 
create
> >anaglyph movies directly with the NuView by placing coloured gels 
on the
> >front of the device.
> 
> Awhile back I did report that it does indeed work, albeit not very
> well. It was a direct feed and was better than any anaglyph
> videotape ever was, considering the limitations of NTSC television.
> 
> I haven't tried inputting directly to computer, but I imagine it
> would be much better. Next time I do some personal web casting
> (by connecting my video camera to the inputs of the computer TV
> tuner), I'll attach my Wasol (NuView clone) and appropriate
> anaglyph filters. 
> 
> Still it's seems a waste to use the video stereo adapter in this
> fashion. John Rupkalvis method is obviously a much better way to
> accomplish this. I've thought of attempting something like John
> described but since I had the NuView clone at hand, I went with
> that, to see if it was doable. It looks promising, especially
> coupled with a computer. Surely others have done this before.
> 
> P.S. I'm surprised no one had come out with a commercial unit
> in all these years, or have they?
> 
> Gabriel


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/