Re: [photo-3d] Re: HOT CHICK . . . .

["Hershel Saylor" <saylor@xxxxxxx>]

> comment on the appropriateness of the word "hot".  However, the rest of
the
> title is obviously very accurate.  Anyone who was offended by the wording
is
> obviously an idiot.

I am generally not considered an idiot and I found the wording offensive.

Would that title have been proper to put in a grade school yearbook or
on a church bulletin?  I only found it offensive because of where it was
found.  I consider this mail list to be a decent place where my young
daughters
can read the mail over my shoulder.  I have received XXX rated spam
that did not try to catch my attention with nearly such sensational subject
lines.

I am not attempting to say that it should not have happened, only that
I felt that my sensibilities had been offended.  In today world where
the pressure is to be "politically correct"  too many people expect the
world to conform to their views. I don't.  I too would have enjoyed the
subject line had it been in a place where I would expect that type of
wording.

                                     Hershel





 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/