Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: [photo-3d] Re: screen shapes
- From: "Dr. George A. Themelis" <drt-3d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Re: screen shapes
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:16:23 -0500
Jim Norman writes:
> The reason consumer screens are square is
> because it accommodates both horizontally and vertically oriented full frame
> 35 mm slides (in 2D), without having to compromise on the projected size or
> content of either orientation.
Personally, I think both orientations are compromised by not
taking advantage of the entire screen area. Only the Realist
and other square formats benefit from a square screen.
> For personal and club
> work, square is the way to go, unless you want to exclude, truncate or
> diminish the projected size of vertical shots...
I respectfully disagree. Vertical 3d is an exception. It should
not dictate the aspect ratio of a stereo club's screen.
If I were in charge of ordering a screen for a stereo club,
I would order a horizontal screen. Those who want to
project vertical 3d slides they are welcome to use
the vertical height of the screen.
To go one step further, I think vertical 3d should be banned
from stereo clubs! :)
Signed: DrT - Dictator of 3d!
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|