Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[photo-3d] Re: Digital vs Film
- From: mramstad@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [photo-3d] Re: Digital vs Film
- Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2001 02:37:02 -0000
I agree that the appearance of digital stereo cameras
is inevitable. However, I don't think that will
happen while the technology is changing so rapidly.
Currently, the manufacturers must be concerned about
being on the cutting edge, selling their inventory,
and getting their investment back before the camera
becomes obsolete. On the other hand, the feature of
being able to twin two digital cameras seems like such
a small technological step, that it is surprising that
it hasn't already happened just by accident.
About the JPS format, I never understood its advantages
except for flagging images to be used with a particular
plug-in in web browsers. Other than that, it seems to
me to be a complete nuisance. Is there some other
advantage of the JPS extension? Is it really necessary
in the applications you suggested? Wouldn't it be
better for the JPS extension be added upstream when
it is needed?
Dr. Monte Ramstad
www.pokescope.com
--- In photo-3d@xxxx, Project3D@xxxx wrote:
> Actually, it's my prediction (that I've been making for a year or
two...)
> that in a reasonably short space of time one of the digital camera
> manufacturers will come out with a digital stereo camera which
incorporates
> the firmware to output JPS images straight to 3-D viewing devices.
>
> Bob Aldridge
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|