Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: [photo-3d] Digital vs Film

  • From: "Marshall Rubin" <mrubin@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [photo-3d] Digital vs Film
  • Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2001 00:22:26 -0400
you could spend even more on an rbt, like i did. aren't they fun to lug
around?  and see how long, and how much it takes to get one fixed.  i had
many great shoots with my rbt, but as i got older, they got HEAVIER! (didn't
know cameras could put on weight.

Project3D@xxxxxxx wrote:
> I suspect that not everybody can afford two digital cameras
> at $2000 - $3000 each when they can get equivalent results with
> film for $100 - $200! Even if you add in £1000 for a film scanner...


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/