Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Ain't talking?
- From: T3D john bercovitz <bercov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Ain't talking?
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 09:25:34 -0800
>> I interpreted this to mean that he tilted the flattie in the
>> scanner: one direction to get a left view and the other
>> direction to get a right view. But I may be way off base here.
>> Only Michael can tell and he ain't talkin'. 8-)
> Well, that's cuz I've been trying to get Stereoscopy out not so
> late! Setting algebra equations takes a very long time and plus
> I think there's an error...
Well just don't tell anyone _who_ proof read that manuscript and
was supposed to have found those errors that you've found, OK?
Thanks. Much appreciated. 8-)
> Naw, what my roommate and lifelong professional photographer
> suggested to do, was scan a flattie, make two copies of it
> (identical in every way) then rotate the image in space, as for
> example about 2 degrees on the Y axis. What would happen is, as
> has been discussed, some keystoning. Several bitmap editors
> have the ability to seem to rotate an image on the Y axis, but
> that is no different than a picture pasted to a plane, and then
> the plane itself rotated.
Oops! So I did misinterpret it - the manipulation is being done
in the computer. Well, as a first approximation, I would claim
this is similar to the process I described but it does look like
Larry Berlin read your note better than I did. *-)
John B
------------------------------
|