Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: SL3D per John B et al


  • From: T3D john bercovitz <bercov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: SL3D per John B et al
  • Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 16:26:53 -0700

I thought I ought to bring this over to T3D because it's kind of
a picky thing I want to discuss.

John B wrote:
> ....  Of course now your big problem is 
> how to separate or decode the two images; they will want to land 
> practically on top of each other and will indeed land on top of 
> each other for an in-focus object.
 
Paul Kline wrote:
> They do land on top of each other, but because they are captured
> from different perspectives they won't be identical - a common
> mis-assumption.

I was talking about the in-focus images from the two perspectives 
being exactly superimposed.  Is this what you were talking about, 
Paul?  Here's how I came to think what I said:

In the ideal camera lens (and most these days aren't too far from 
ideal) the imaging is plane to plane.  Only an object point in the 
in-focus object plane will be in focus on the image (film) plane.  
All object points not on the in-focus plane are out of focus.  OK, 
now I would contend that any and all parts of the lens focus each 
individual point of the in-focus object plane to the same individual 
place on the image (film) plane or else the thing is out of focus.  
Do you agree?  I've misread you, right?

Thanks,
John


------------------------------