Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: SL3D per John B et al
- From: T3D john bercovitz <bercov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: SL3D per John B et al
- Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 16:26:53 -0700
I thought I ought to bring this over to T3D because it's kind of
a picky thing I want to discuss.
John B wrote:
> .... Of course now your big problem is
> how to separate or decode the two images; they will want to land
> practically on top of each other and will indeed land on top of
> each other for an in-focus object.
Paul Kline wrote:
> They do land on top of each other, but because they are captured
> from different perspectives they won't be identical - a common
> mis-assumption.
I was talking about the in-focus images from the two perspectives
being exactly superimposed. Is this what you were talking about,
Paul? Here's how I came to think what I said:
In the ideal camera lens (and most these days aren't too far from
ideal) the imaging is plane to plane. Only an object point in the
in-focus object plane will be in focus on the image (film) plane.
All object points not on the in-focus plane are out of focus. OK,
now I would contend that any and all parts of the lens focus each
individual point of the in-focus object plane to the same individual
place on the image (film) plane or else the thing is out of focus.
Do you agree? I've misread you, right?
Thanks,
John
------------------------------
|