Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
T3D Re: T3D Re: T3D Now yer in trouble
- From: bercov@xxxxxxxxxxx (John Bercovitz)
- Subject: T3D Re: T3D Re: T3D Now yer in trouble
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 98 09:18:46 PST
> What format? 35mm or MF? If 35 mm do we
> want 5 perf coverage or 7 or 8 perf? Ortho
> FL or not?
I guess most people on this list would be
interested in 35 mm format. MF is easy
and large format even easier. V-M is
difficult but not too difficult because
of the smaller field of view. So I would
guess people would be most interested in
35. I would think ortho. If not ortho,
again, the design is not that difficult -
a cemented doublet would do. But I think
the decision as to which lens is most
wanted should be up to the group so I
left that blank.
> Are we talking a big diameter lens for
> homebuilt viewers or a 20 or 25 mm diameter
> ocular that we can retrofit our red buttons
> or Kodaslide II's with?
What would you like? I would personally
like a lens of large enough diameter that
no adjustment is necessay but the cost could
be exorbitant.
> How much is "won't be any more expensive
> than off-the-shelf lenses"? $20 a pair,
> $50 a pair or $100 a pair?
I would think this would be a many-lens design
and so would cost like a good telescope eyepiece
or ~$100 each, $200/pair. Is this too scary?
> Questions, questions - Greg E.
Good ones, too. Thanks for kicking off the
discussion.
John B
------------------------------
|