T3D Re: Re stereo math

[Tom Deering <tmd@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 9/16/98, aij.klooswyk@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Tom Deering wrote:
>>I visualize 1.2mm of onfilm deviation as being related to the amount of
>>convergence the eyes can comfortably do.  Would it be just as correct >to
>>>measure it as an angle?  And is that why the 1.2 mm is actually >f/30?
>
>Not so long ago I wrote to P3D: THINK IN ANGLES.
>This obvious didn't pass Tom's filters, can think of 3 reasons:
>1. the posting was long,
>2. it used capitals,
>3. it contained a horrible ASCII-drawing.

No idea what you mean.  I read it with great enthusiasm, ignoring the
faults mentioned.

Tom



------------------------------