T3D Re: Deering spreadsheet

[Tom Deering <tmd@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mr. Themelis writes:
> pair, works.  There are no technical, scientific or aesthetic arguments
> that a pair with 1.2 mm on film deviation works better than one with
> 0.5 mm (just to pick a value).  YES, my interest in any spreadsheet
> that calculates the stereobase that will result in 1.2 mm OFD is academic
> only.


If Geoorge disagrees with the geometric foundation of the spreadsheet, why
does he care if it reads millimeters or not?

And if he doesn't have any need for my spreadsheet, that I can only wonder
about his motives for picking it apart here.  Unless, of course, he wants
to revive our old Photo-3D argument here.  His beligerence in that forum on
this topic is a reason I left.

If George likes the 1/30 rule for macros, then he should use it.  By the
same token, if he likes the 1/30 rule for macros, he certainly doesn't need
my spreadsheet.

As I have said before, those who are undecided should take their own macro
photos, comparing the MAOFD formula with the placebo.  Make your own
judgement.

Tom



------------------------------