Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
IR flash & NV notes
- From: "Willem-Jan Markerink" <w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
- Subject: IR flash & NV notes
- Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 14:34:34 +0000
Hi gang,
While digging through my pile of IR documents and books, I found some
more flash related comments:
Extracted from "Fotografieren auf andere Wellenlaenge", by Rudolf
Hillebrand.
- He mentiones that flash has the same spectral output as photo
lamps; ie relatively twice the output in IR as daylight. A bit
confusing IMO, since the color temperature of flash (5000-5500K) is
almost identical to daylight, not to photo flood lights (3200K).
Maybe a flash bulb cannot be considered a true black body light
source afterall.
He also states that Nitrophot lights are recommended for IR studio
work [does anyone know what color temperature those have?]. Halogen
(3200K) bulbs are also a good alternative, because of the higher
light output in general, 1000W is common.
- the following manufacturers make/made IR covers for their flashes:
-Metz (think only for the 60, combined with a fresnel/tele cover)
-Sunpak for the 622 Pro
-Nikon made a special version of the SB-14, the SB-140; one year after
the release of the UV-Nikkor f4.0/105mm. This SB-140 came with three
covers, the SW-5V for visible output, SW-5UV for UV output
(300-400nm, GN 16), and SW-5IR for IR output (750-1100nm, GN 22).
Assuming that the '140' stands for the visible GN in feet, the GN in
meter was 43. So for *that* flash the IR GN was halved....
BTW, in line of unobtrusive animal photography this chapter is
followed by a chapter on night-vision scopes. I knew I read about
the Zeiss N-Mirotar photo scope before, but only after rereading I
discover that this contraption was made for Yashica/Kyocera, with a
Contax/Yashica mount. Anyone ever seen this beast?
He also mentiones the fact that Pentax had such a NV photo-scope in
its program, for a very brief period. Can anyone remember that? (I
am probably too young to know all this....8-))
Extracted from "Moderne Infrarot- und UV-Fotografie", by Guenter
Spitzing:
- #87C gel filters show heat defects after 100 bursts or so
- GN's for flash covered with Schott RG 780 or #87C:
-disposable flash blocks: HIE 20, IE 14
-AG3B/XMlb: HIE 25, IE 18
(I assume this is a flash, beats me what brand/model
-general flash with GN 26/28: HIE 32(?), IE 18
- ISO setting for EOS camera (pay attention Joe!):
-'flash' covered with RG780/#87C: HIE 200/24, IE 100/21
(I guess they mean EOS flash here)
-Sunpak 622 IR head: HIE 400/27(!), IE 80/19
- the book also mentions that owls are highly insensitive to IR
light, in contrast to almost any other bird. Fish in general also.
Maybe a bio expert amoung us can add a few more samples?
- for maximum light output, one can also consider using a UV/short
pass filter, like the Wratten #18B or Schott UG1 or UG11. Almost all
UV pass filters also transmit IR, so given the UV sensitivity of both
HIE and IE, one can use the invisible UV *and* IR spectrum with these
filters.
That's all for now!....:-))
--
Bye,
_/ _/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/_/
_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/ _/
_/ _/ illem _/ _/ an _/ _/ _/ arkerink
_/_/_/
The difference
between men and boys
is the price of their toys
<w.j.markerink@xxxxx>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
------------------------------
Topic No. 13
|