Re: (FWD) Re: Got the specs: Dimage Scan Dual

[The Ghost Hunter <ghosthunter@xxxxxxx>]

Robert Long wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 03 Jul 1997 10:16:38 +0100 (MET), you wrote:
> 
> |To me it seems that most people on the list that are
> |''into scanning'' scan the negatives instead of the
> |prints. Why? Negs scanners are more expensive and even
> 
> I for one don't have a darkroom anymore, and I can process negs but
> not prints in the kitchen.  Nor do I have a really competent local lab
> that I can trust to make the sort of initial prints I'd want for
> scanning.
> 
> Bob Long
> (boblong@xxxxxxxxxxx)

     Yes, but any flatbed scanner usually has the capability to invert
the color or B&W image so that you can convert a negative into a
positive (print) on the computer, I have done it, and generally do get
better results than trying to scann in prints for work... I sue kodak
Infra-red b&w to shoot paranormal occurances, then I scan the
negatyives, and enhance the images from there..

ghosthunter@xxxxxxx

see my web page htt://www.ghgcorp.com/ghosthunter
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------

End of Infrared-Digest V0 #104
******************************