Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: plastic sheets


  • From: Jaap Los <losjb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: plastic sheets
  • Date: Sat, 05 Jul 1997 14:32:53 +0200

George L Smyth wrote:
> 
> Jaap Los wrote:
> >
> > Besides my 35 mm equipment I have a Bronica ETRSi  4.5x6 cm  together
> > with three lenses. In my opinion an ideal IR camera just as your Mamiya
> > 645. Yours is a great camera! Im also thinking about trying Konica
> > 750.  Sooner or later I will be glad to hear from you about your
> > experiences! I like the Kodak HIE because of its greater latitude. One
> > says that the Konica is very contrasty although sharper and has a finer
> > grain. Its not a real IR film, it only peaks at 750 Nm.  Could the
> > Ilford SFX 200 be an alternative?? In the book of Laurie White there is
> > an example and a comparison of the two films (Kodak and Konica). I like
> > the Kodak picture. Still I want to try it to convince myself! Anyway,
> > Ill keep you informed.
> 
> Konica IR is a real IR film, although it doesn't go nearly as far into
> the IR spectrum as HIE.  Ilford SFX is not an IR film, but an
> extended-red film.  Konica is definitely more contrasty and finer
> grained.  This can be inferred by the fact that most of us shoot HIE
> around EI 250 and Konica around EI 8.
> 
> My suggestion is that you consider the nature of your image and how you
> want the results to look when decided which film to use.  I have images
> of both on my Web page and I purposely selected the film to match the
> scene.  Obviously, this is personal choice, so your opinion may not be
> the same as mine. <g>
> 
> The bottom line is that we are very fortunate to have a choice between
> these two films.
> 
> Cheers -
> 
> george
> 
> --
>  Handmade Photographic Images
>   http://www2.ari.net/glsmyth/
> *
> ****
> *******
> ******************************************************
> *  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
> *         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
> *       to                                           *
> *         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
> *----------------------------------------------------*
> *   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
> *  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
> ******************************************************
Hi George,
Thanks for your information! You are quite right and I have learned
again another aspect of infrared photography! I'm very glad with your
additional remarks as it is meant for completing my knowlegde. Please go
on, much appreciated!
Cheers
Jaap Los
Holland
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------