Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Autoexposure Follies? (was Re: Nikon Data Backs


  • From: pico <pico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Autoexposure Follies? (was Re: Nikon Data Backs
  • Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 14:02:27 -0600

All this talk about the difficulty of using a modern, highly advanced camera
for IR seems to indicate that it's simply not a good choice, and perhaps a
totally manual, nonelectric, simple camera would be best. Perhaps an old
Nikon F, Leica M, Olympus, Koni-Omega 6x7, etc...

This _assumes_ that integrated meters cannot really be set properly for IR
work. In my experience, using a spot-meter and accustomed to the Zone
system, IR exposures under diverse conditions requires a great deal of human
judgement, and final exposures are all over the place. Can a modern camera
be set to autoexpose properly? Really?

very best, and no disrespect intended to current technology!
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************

------------------------------