Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Flash with Infrared Film
- From: "David J. Carlyon" <david@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Flash with Infrared Film
- Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 10:10:08 -0500
At 06:09 PM 5/23/99 -0500, you wrote:
>If you use ISO 200, then use the same setting for flash. It's really no
>different using direct on camera flash with HIE and #25 red filter.
>
>Russ Rosener
That's what I had assumed, but on the roll I tested this with, the shots
from outdoors with no flash were somewhat underexposed, but still usable
(actually, they were underdeveloped, not underexposedI've since learned to
drastically increase the recommended development times for XTOL with HIE),
while the indoor flash pictures were extremely underexposed (or well
underexposed in addition to being underdeveloped like the rest of the
roll). Maybe I should rate it at ISO 50 or something... I guess a test roll
is probably the only way, since everybody does IR a bit differently (more
so than even b&w).
David
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|