Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
| Notice |
|
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: Bio and first stab at HIE
- From: "Nelson Enochs" <syrinx2112ad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Bio and first stab at HIE
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 16:48:29 CDT
George/Kevan/and whomever,
My advice was only intended to give Kevan a place to start from so that he
can get at least one good roll with minimal effort and technical tinkering.
This mailing list is good and all, but I find most of the topics can be
excessively technical at times. George is right because the method that I
suggested does limit the photographer as far as situations are concerned
because it is basically a rule of thumb for a "bright/sunny day". However,
if someone who is an amateur photographer and wants to get started with
infrared photography, that is my best advice. Sure, there are many things
to explore with this medium as far as metering, focusing, developing, and
printing are concerned, but if you want to skip the technical stuff first
and get your feet wet, then just set the camera at 125/f16 on a sunny day
and get after it.
Nelson
>From: George L Smyth <glsmyth@xxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: infrared@xxxxx
>To: infrared@xxxxx
>Subject: Re: Bio and first stab at HIE
>Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 13:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>--- Nelson Enochs <syrinx2112ad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Kevan,
> >
> > Hey, welcome to the mailing list. I don't usually put my two cents in,
>but
> > I'm making an exception in this case. The only thing I know is that you
> > should probably forget about trying to meter through your lens. You
>should
> > also forget about trying to rate the film.
>
>I'll disagree here. I've metered HIE (and HSI) through a #25 filter at EI
>250
>for a great many years with excellent success (obviously, "success" is an
>opinion, but I mean to imply that the negatives are easily printable). I
>speed
>the film up as the summer goes on and slow it down during winter (generally
>speaking).
>
>Each meter will react differently to the presence of infrared radiation, as
>it
>is not calibrated for such. Learning how to use the value returned by your
>meter in these situations can make things very easy -- and all it takes is
>a
>bit of testing.
>
>Going with Kodak's suggestions does work, but then you are confined to a
>specific set of circumstances. I've found that testing and experience make
>things very straightforward -- to the extent that I very seldom bracket and
>am
>very seldom surprised after developing the negatives.
>
>Cheers -
>
>george
>
>=====
>Handmade Photographic Images
>http://members.home.net/hmpi/
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Send instant messages with Yahoo! Messenger.
>http://im.yahoo.com/
>*
>****
>*******
>******************************************************
>* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
>* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
>* to *
>* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
>*----------------------------------------------------*
>* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
>* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
>******************************************************
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
*
****
*******
******************************************************
* To remove yourself from this list, send: *
* UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED *
* to *
* MAJORDOMO@xxxxx *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links: *
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm *
******************************************************
|