Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: IR with no direct sunlight


  • From: "Keith Zimmerman" <zz_ir@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: IR with no direct sunlight
  • Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 18:07:37 CDT

Yes George, I would also recommend developing the film myself, but I will 
not do any film or paper developing because I refuse to introduce 
photgraphic chemistry into my septic system (settling tank and leach field) 
and the open environment.  If I still lived in town where waste water was 
processed, I would still have a darkroom and do everything myself.  This was 
the only con to relocating my family to the country.

Thank you for the information.

Keith Zimmerman
zz_ir@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://homepage.dave-world.net/~vkzimm/infrared.html



>From: George L Smyth <glsmyth@xxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: infrared@xxxxx
>To: infrared@xxxxx
>Subject: Re: IR with no direct sunlight
>Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 04:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>--- Keith Zimmerman <zz_ir@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > David, you suggest changing the development time when shooting on an
> > overcast day.  Would you suggest a starting percentage for changing that
> > time?  Here in the Central Illinois countryside, we get a lot of 
>overcast
> > days when the seasons change and I want to experiment.
> >
> > Since I do not have nor have a darkroom, I rely on an excellent lab for 
>my
> > processing.  They use TMAX at 75 degrees.  The only variable is the 
>time.
>
>I would recommend doing your own film processing.  It is very easy, does 
>not
>require a darkroom, and you are ensured excellent results.
>
>One would shoot faster and extend the development time to compensate for a
>scene that lacks contrast.  Of course, much depends upon how much contrast 
>you
>want to add to the scene, so it is difficult to give more than a very 
>general
>suggestion.  Perhaps shooting a stop faster and developing for an 
>additional
>15% would be helpful.  If you are using roll film, obviously this will 
>affect
>all frames on the roll.
>
>Cheers -
>
>george
>
>=====
>Handmade Photographic Images
>http://members.home.net/hmpi/
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
>http://photos.yahoo.com/
>*
>****
>*******
>******************************************************
>*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
>*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
>*       to                                           *
>*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
>*----------------------------------------------------*
>*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
>*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
>******************************************************



_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.

*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************