Re: IR with no direct sunlight

[Colin McKie <colinmckie@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Keith Zimmerman wrote:
> 
> Yes George, I would also recommend developing the film myself, but I will
> not do any film or paper developing because I refuse to introduce
> photgraphic chemistry into my septic system (settling tank and leach field)
> and the open environment.  If I still lived in town where waste water was
> processed, I would still have a darkroom and do everything myself.  This was
> the only con to relocating my family to the country.

Keith,

You are certainly not going to upset your septic tank or the environment
by processing film at amateur usage levels, although large amounts of
printing might be more of a problem. Beyond the practical
considerations, you could store your spent chemicals and wash water -
use a water change rather than continuous flow strategy - and dispose of
them when convenient.
*
****
*******
******************************************************
*  To remove yourself from this list, send:          *
*         UNSUBSCRIBE INFRARED                       *
*       to                                           *
*         MAJORDOMO@xxxxx                            *
*----------------------------------------------------*
*   For the IR-FAQ, IR-Gallery and heaps of links:   *
*  http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm  *
******************************************************