Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[MF3D.FORUM:553] Re: Exact fl match for paired lenses.
- From: "Bill Glickman" <bglick@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:553] Re: Exact fl match for paired lenses.
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 12:07:21 -0700
Les
This is a fabulous fix for SLR cameras so you can see what the mirror
is showing... however, I am using rangefinder M7 camera, so I would have no
clue what the image to film would be..... But I am not letting go of the
mirrors just yet..
Thanks for the input, others with SLR's probably have light bulbs going off
in their head right now....
Bill G
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Moore" <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 10:22 AM
Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:549] Re: Exact fl match for paired lenses.
> Many of the 1950's era 3-D movies were made by taking two conventional
> movie cameras (eg. Mitchell) and pointing them at each other.
> Between the lenses were placed two front surface mirrors to give
> the desired seperation.
>
> -------- / \ --------
> | camera |== / \ ==| camera |
> -------- / \ --------
>
> Ray Zone gave a presentation on 50's stereo movies to the SCSC meeting
last week.
>
> Lee
>
>
> >>>"Bill Glickman" said:
> > Tom
> >
> > Thats a fabulous idea... is there anyone you know of, who can
make a
> > mirror arrangement to shorten my stereo base? I sure would like to
try
> > it... I overlooked this option.... the only time I have seen mirrors
used
> > was with a beam splitter which would not be too effective with
MF.....anyone
> > tried this before or know who could make one?
> >
> > This raises another question... is there any beam splitters
available
> > for 4x5? That would be perfect, 2 MF images on one chrome, with one
lens?
> > I already have all the LF gear...David Lee, are you out there? I am
sure
> > you have explored this before? Thank you..
> >
> >
> > Bill G
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tom Hubin" <thubin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 8:01 PM
> > Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:528] Re: Exact fl match for paired lenses.
> >
> >
> > > Hello Bill,
> > >
> > > > Maybe I am making some mistakes or overlooking something major? I
am
> > worn
> > > > out and have exhausted my 3d knowledge.... Any input would be
helpful,
> > at
> > > > this point, I'll even accept a pat on the back.... and a "Nice try"
> > remark
> > >
> > > You could use mirrors to reduce the seperation. Ideally each camera
> > > would have a pair of mirrors acting like a sideways periscope. The
> > > cameras can be seperated as much as you like with a mirror centered
on
> > > each camera lens. The center mirrors would be 62mm apart.
> > >
> > > You could probably get away with one pair of mirrors on one camera
only.
> > > The object distance from the camera with the mirrors would be greater
> > > than the object distance from the camera without the mirrors, but
only
> > > by a few inches. So it might not matter that only one camera uses a
pair
> > > of mirrors.
> > >
> > > Tom Hubin
> > > thubin@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------
> Lee Moore Xerox Architecture Center
>
|