[MF3D.FORUM:857] Re: Cameras

["don lopp" <dlopp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

As I said before you must make some simple interior modifications Which you
said you wouldn't put up with Remember I offered to do it!!I don't have a
clue as to how you would modify your Heidoscope to 220 with out serious
alterations.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Twichell" <rmt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2000 6:41 AM
Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:850] Re: Cameras


> Don Lopp wrote:
>
> > As reguards to Rolleidoscope You , are  apparently willing to butcher
your
> > Rolleidoscope for 220 film but you were not willing to make any
alterations
> > to the camera to get 6 STEREO PAIRS   as I indicated was neccessary and
you
> > wonder why it did'not work out --surprised   ??? Don--as you can see I
have
> > not mastered this key board!!!! Dons as I indicated  was
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Richard Twichell" <rmt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Medium Format 3D Photography" <MF3D.Forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 9:05 AM
> > Subject: [MF3D.FORUM:680] Re: Cameras
>
> > >
> > > > don lopp wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The first thing I did with my Rolleidoscope was to convert
> > > > > it over to 6 stereo pairs Don.
> > > >
> > > > I'd love to hear your technique for doing so, Don.  I've
> > > > been mangling my attempts to get it straight.
> > > >
> > > > Paul Talbot
> > >
> > > I tried Don's directions with my Heidescop with rollfilm back and
ended
> > > up with lots of overlapping pairs - perhaps the Rolleidescop advance
> > > scheme is different...Anyway I prefer the extra-wide chips with the
> > > 5-pair advance, for tweaking the window...What I would really like is
a
> > > 6x7 advance for 220 film fitted to the Heidescop - 10 pairs with a
> > > double wind for each shot...but am not clever enough to make one.
> > >
> > > Dick Twichell
> > >
> >
> >
>
> 1)  I am not willing, or able, to "butcher my Rolleidescope" as I don't
> have one.
>
> 2)  I have a Heidescop, which has a removable roll-film back, and I
> proposed building another back for it for 220 film.  No original
> equipment would be touched.
>
> 3)  I did try your 6-pair advance, following the directions carefully
> and using the numbered guide you thoughtfully made for me next to the
> red window.  It didn't work at all as the spacing was all wrong,
> creating overlaps.  I didn't pursue this further as I'd prefer to
> sacrifice the 6th pair in order to have the wider chips.
>
> 4)  I thank you for your interest.  I will bring the Heidescop to Mesa.
> If you're coming perhaps we can compare notes and see why your
> Rolleidescop 6-pair advance alteration doesn't work on the Heidescop.
>
> Dick Twichell
>