Re: Which stereo camera is best to convert to 35x100 or so panoramic?

[M Tyler <mtyler@xxxxxxxxxx>]

After hearing the comment about "rewinding" the exposed film
in the dark -- 
you might think about loading the camera in the dark with
the film pulled OUT of the cassett, and then pull the
EXPOSED film back INTO the cassett.
I like the idea of having the exposed film in a safe place
and wish all cameras did this!
Just a thought,
Marshall

YDegroot@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> Thansk for all the suggestions.
> 
> I think I will do better to keep running 35mm film through my Brooks Plaubel
> Veriwide with 47mm S-Angulon: I already get 24x90mm exposures. I'll make a
> special mask to go inside the camera, and I'll just have to rewind the film in
> the dark to get it back into the 35mm cassette. I'll get 7 exp. on 24-exp.
> roll, without wasting too much film.
> 
> Or, I can go out and buy the new X-pan, but darn, only 65mm wide! That kinda
> bugs me! I really wish someone makes something wider than that.
> 
> How about the new Rodenstock Grandagon 35mm lens with focusing tube on a 35mm
> body, and see how wide you can get? Wow, wouldn't that be something. Anybody
> done that?????

-- 
    /---------------------------------------------------
    |       Marshall E. Tyler, CRA, FOPS         
    |  MailTo:MTyler@xxxxxxxxxx  http://www.wfubmc.edu/eye  
    |  Ophthalmic Photography: Saine & Tyler 
    |       http://www.wfubmc.edu/eye/book
    |     Wake Forest University Eye Center      
    |     Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1033  USA  
    \---------------------------------------------------