Re: Which stereo camera is best to convert to 35x100 or so panoramic?

[Steve Shapiro <sgshiya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Canon cameras do this.

S. Shapiro
-----Original Message-----
From: M Tyler <mtyler@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, December 15, 1998 11:08 AM
Subject: Re: Which stereo camera is best to convert to 35x100 or so
panoramic?


After hearing the comment about "rewinding" the exposed film
in the dark --
you might think about loading the camera in the dark with
the film pulled OUT of the cassett, and then pull the
EXPOSED film back INTO the cassett.
I like the idea of having the exposed film in a safe place
and wish all cameras did this!
Just a thought,
Marshall

YDegroot@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Thansk for all the suggestions.
>
> I think I will do better to keep running 35mm film through my Brooks
Plaubel
> Veriwide with 47mm S-Angulon: I already get 24x90mm exposures. I'll make a
> special mask to go inside the camera, and I'll just have to rewind the
film in
> the dark to get it back into the 35mm cassette. I'll get 7 exp. on 24-exp.
> roll, without wasting too much film.
>
> Or, I can go out and buy the new X-pan, but darn, only 65mm wide! That
kinda
> bugs me! I really wish someone makes something wider than that.
>
> How about the new Rodenstock Grandagon 35mm lens with focusing tube on a
35mm
> body, and see how wide you can get? Wow, wouldn't that be something.
Anybody
> done that?????

--
    /---------------------------------------------------
    |       Marshall E. Tyler, CRA, FOPS
    |  MailTo:MTyler@xxxxxxxxxx  http://www.wfubmc.edu/eye
    |  Ophthalmic Photography: Saine & Tyler
    |       http://www.wfubmc.edu/eye/book
    |     Wake Forest University Eye Center
    |     Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1033  USA
    \---------------------------------------------------