Re: pano & wide angle

[dusariez <dusariez.pano.optic@xxxxxxxxx>]

PLEASE STOP TO EXPOSE YOUR PERSONNAL  feelings about  your post, filtering
and narrow-mindedness, make that in private. Thanks in advance.
Michel DUSARIEZ


>
>"Henning J. Wulff" wrote:
>
>At 10:03 AM -0400 10/29/99, Simon Nathan wrote:
>dear steve- please tell simon what or who is the  the source of the
>question because it is so perfect that it would appear to be a ringer.
>it can be answered at several different levels. i hesitate to answer out of
>my pool of forty years experience. my answers might offend, frinstance....
> 
>
>Simon Nathan wrote:
>
>  GOODBYE, HENNING! SIGNED:SIMON
>
>  "Henning J. Wulff" wrote:
>
>    Please, Simon, use standard fonts. I enjoy the contents of your posts,
>but
>    I'm at the point of filtering your posts to trash due to the junky way
>they
>    come across.T.S.
>
>       *            Henning J. Wulff
>      /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>     /###\  
><<mailto:henningw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>mailto:henningw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:henningw
>@archiphoto.com>mailto:henningw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     |[ ]|    
><<http://www.archiphoto.com>http://www.archiphoto.com><http://www.archiphoto.com
>>http://www.archiphoto.com
>ahmad hosni wrote:
>
>What is the difference between a pano & an ordinary wide angle? If it is
>just the crop, then why bother to buy a pano?
>But I understand there are manytypes of panos; so which type is actually
>able to give me a wide angle ( around 200 degrees) without a distortion
>& by not just rcopping the image?
>
>so let's just say that it is generally a ratio and this includes the narrow
>mind.
>simon says! thank you, ahmad.
>
>This is getting out of hand.
>
>I sent you, Simon, a private message regarding use of fonts, _only_. I
>understand, and understood when I sent the initial message, that you have
>problems with you vision, which I as a fellow photographer (also with 40
>years experience) sympathize with deeply. However, there are ways of
>writing in larger fonts yet sending unformatted text, just as there are
>ways to increase the size of text that you receive.
>
>You have now misquoted me, distributed my message to a number of people
>directly and now have taken the message I sent privately and posted it to
>the list. Additionally, you have now accused me of narrow-mindedness.
>That's a new one, and I fail to see how that can be deduced from a request
>for using fonts in the usual mailing list standard way.
>dear henry- how could you say that you were misquoted if your exact
>message was copied and certainly  not excerpted or retyped? please
>identify for me which one of the righteous brothers you are.simon
>nathan    first you choose to censor my typing and you promised to filter
>me out and you didn't even keep that promise.next, i am not accusing you
>of narrow mindedness. you are completely competant at making that point
>without simon. that message was aimed to ahman. i can't determine how
>messages get there. it may have been lifted from  another panoramic list
>by steve and forwarded to this list.     Will you please drop it.   simon
>nathan
>
>
>   *            Henning J. Wulff
>  /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
> /###\   <mailto:henningw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>mailto:henningw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> |[ ]|     <http://www.archiphoto.com>http://www.archiphoto.com
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------
  DUSARIEZ Michel
  14, avenue Capitaine Piret, B-1150 BRUSSELS - BELGIUM
  Tel : 32 2 513 21 46 - Fax 32 2 512 68 29
  <dusariez.pano.optic@xxxxxxxxx>
  http://users.skynet.be/dusariez/
--------------------------------------------------------------------