Re: [Fwd: seitz roundshot 220 vr] schultress

[Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This response indicates a serious deficiency in the senses of humour and
tolerence and is far more offensive than any possible sarcasm in the
original message. I have noted in the past that the rudest people are often
extremely intolerent of even the mildest rudeness in others - one of lifes
little ironies?
Andrew

>You know, this is getting quite tiresome.
>
>Though your stories about having worked with this or that person on this
>or that movie are mildly interesting, without some actual panoramic
>photography content, your messages are just a waste of bandwidth and
>everyone's time.
>
>Your snide comments about unsubscribers are simply childish.  Try to
>contribute something useful for once.
>
>And I mean that with all due respect...
>
>On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, simon nathan wrote:
>
>> three widelux is correct number. i trust that nobody unsubscribes because of
>> this serious error.