Re: Pan sharpness, was Roundshot 220VR

[simon nathan <simonwide@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

dear andy-i think i'd like to hear it from mr.
seitz as to what he actually told you . it could be that it is his experience
building and selling cameras. it certainly is not mine.   simon
nathan
get your own hands-on experience and then
you will know what the image smear variable factor can be. look up time
magazine in the library. see my across two pages stock exchange hulcherama...slow
turn, some people blurred yet you can read three diff digital clocks on
the wall..aug 1982...ws bulls on cover. cripes, and i ain't even a scientist.
simon nathan

Andy Buck wrote:

> Please keep in mind, I was only re writing
> what Mr. Seitz wrote me.
> He said no lens on a rotational camera would be as
> sharp as the same lens on
> a still camera.

And some 'industry standard' lenses on flat film
aren't as sharp as some pans: I use a schneider 120mm
symmar-s and a Noblex 150: on the same
film/development at the same magnification, the noblex
is noticeably sharper. That may have to due with its
coverage being far less, i.e. the diff between medium
and large format optics, however.

Andy

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos -- now, 100 FREE prints!
http://photos.yahoo.com