Re: Rebuttal: Why IAPP is not for us.

[Greg <gregbuys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello
   I would like to hear more about this, and yes i am a member of IAPP
Greg Vannasse

Steve Shapiro wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <MMagid3005@xxxxxxx>
> To: <cirkut8@xxxxxxxxx>; <panorama-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 12:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Rebuttal: Why IAPP is not for us.
>
> > How about taking your dispute elsewhere -- get back on topic and stop
> wasting
> > the time of hundreds of people.
>
> Excuse me, but there are tons of people interested in this dispute.  There
> is yet another dispute regarding those using pano cameras touting themselves
> as IAPP members and they're not.
>
> The organization and such credibility gives us all an integrity to promote
> out craft.  You guys who tap into this resource withut paying the $50 a year
> are 'bogus dudes!'
>
> I wanna know, I wanna know it all ... all about this asset of registration
> and the way we pass around information is meanst to remunerate us.
>
> We, we who pay ... we who pay the $50 a roll, minimum 100 rolls who pass it
> around and cyphon off the extras to those who have worked in want to know if
> it is all going to go away.  We have a reason and not trivial.
>
> There is a serious question, here.  One person, in particular, is a life
> time memember whose name was dropped off the list.  So, what's the value of
> the list?
>
> I'm interested.  Many of us who pay the $50 are interested and if you're not
> paying the $50 either delete yourself off this list or sit back and lurk.
>
> Translation:  Go Blow if you don't like this discussion -- more than likely
> you're not a member.
>
> Steve Shapiro, Carmel, CA
> wish I was in Nappa