Re: Loreo-e-i-oh!

[fj834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Dr. George A. Themelis)]

>It was then that George Themelis launched into a speech about 
>how awful the Loreo is.  Something about people who buy them
>being lazy TV-watching bums.  >Rev. Robert Linnstaedt

I have replied to this but my reply appears to have been lost...

Dear Rev., please be careful about how you quote people.  That's not what I
said.  That's what you read in my postings... I did not say that the Loreo
is "awful".  I said that the results from this system are inferior to
classic stereo cameras.  And I did *not* make any comments regarding the
character of people who use the Loreo.  

My point is that stereo photography with a classic stereo camera is not as
expensive or difficult as some people might think.  You are not helping
anyone by saying that you need $500+ investement to get started into 3-d
with a Realist camera, a statement which IMO is plain wrong.

Please note that I have no financial reasons to support a dead camera
system.  I am hobbyist and I am expressing my own personal opinions.  I
think we can debade this issue without losing our temper or misquoting each
other. 

Thank you! -- George Themelis


------------------------------