Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: format image comparisons


  • From: bercov@xxxxxxxxxxx (John Bercovitz)
  • Subject: Re: format image comparisons
  • Date: Thu, 25 Jan 96 10:04:00 PST


I hope I'm not posting the same thing twice.  Sometimes I forgets.  8-(

Yesterday I was saying it was harder to make a short lens that covers a
wide format than a long lens that covers the same (angular) width format.  
This is because regardless of format size, you need a large diameter lens 
near your eye to cover all the directions your eye will look in when it's 
viewing a wide format.  A large diameter lens of short focal length is a 
contradiction.  Near the edges of such a lens, the curvature of the lens 
will be very large leading to gross aberrations.  As I said a few years ago, 
I think the thing to do is to make a close-focusing telescope to view the 
images.  It's a lot more complicated than a simple achromat but it would 
allow the use of reasonable, low-aberration lenses.

John B


------------------------------