Re: "Real talent" and composition

[bercov@xxxxxxxxxx (John Bercovitz)]

Dr. T writes:

> Looking at the statistics, I am not very happy to see that twin SLR slides
> have higher changes of success.  This happens for a number of reasons. 
> There are good reasons and bad reasons.  The bad reason is judges being
Received: by bobcat.etsu.edu; id AA16801; Sun, 3 Mar 1996 14:58:35 -0600
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 1996 14:58:35 -0600
Message-Id: <9603042039.AA22941@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Errors-To: 3d-moderators
Reply-To: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Originator: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
From: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: Multiple recipients of list <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: PHOTO-3D digest 1205
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment:   The Stereoscopic Image (Photo-3D) Mailing List  

> impressed by something unusual, something that they don't see too often. 
> Again, from my experience in Detroit I feel that judges tend to underrate
> some good Realist slides and tend to overrate some average twin SLR slides
> based on reasons other than good stereo photography.

On the plus side, you get the excellent lenses which are common on today's 
SLR and a mild amount of hyperstereo which, although it scales objects down, 
enhances the depth effect.

John B


------------------------------