More 3-D movies/video

[P3D Derek Gee <73157.2172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Andrew wrote:
>Regarding the comparison of Anaglyph 3D video to field-sequential 3D video
>made by Derek Gee.  In my experience Anaglyph 3D video quite often 
>doesn't work because of colour generation loss and you never get very
>good separation between the left and right images - broadcast video
>(NTSC or PAL especially from VHS tape) just wasn't designed to be used
>like this.  Whereas field-sequential 3D video maintains very good
>separation between the left and right images to produce very good 3D
>and the images are in full colour.  Yes is does have flicker, but
>if you reduce the brightness of the TV and drop the room lighting,
>the flicker can be reduced to acceptable levels.

Actually Andrew, I wasn't comparing field-sequential video to analglpyh
video.  I said I prefered anaglyph MOVIES to field-sequential video.
I own several anaglyph Super-8 filems and there are no problems with
flicker or color (usually) as when transferred to NTSC video.  I'm
sorry if that wasn't quite clear in my first post.  I have not had
all the negative problems that many people on the list seem to have
had with NTSC Anaglyph videotapes.  However, I am using a NEC monitor
as my screen and it is much more accurate than the average TV.  Contrary
to many previous posts about Rhino video's tapes being garbage I can
assure you they're not.  They work just fine on a properly calibrated
TV.  Now as to the quality of the script... they might be put in 
another category.  ;)
 
                                 Derek Gee
                                 73157.2172@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


------------------------------