Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
Re: "Beamsplitter" & reflected vs. incident
- From: P3D Don Chaps <dchaps@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: "Beamsplitter" & reflected vs. incident
- Date: Sat, 24 Aug 1996 09:11:34 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 23 Aug 1996, P3D William Carter wrote:
>
> shooting a scene lit with a key, fill, kicker, obie etc., a grey card
^^^^
> reading, unlike the incident meter, can't register predictable
> exposures.
>
> --
> wc@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 37deg 39.09'N x 122deg 29.56'W x 90'MLLW
>
>
A bit of trivia. An obie (small soft light mounted on camera) was
invented by Merle Oberon's favorite cameraman and named in her honor.
It's use is make the 3D topography of a face seem 2D (fill wrinkles)(just
trying desparately to give this some 3D relevance).
William Carter's post is accurate, but if you've never used an
incident be aware that some incident meters use a flat opal disk rather
than an opal hemisphere. These meters will exhibit the same
characteristics as the 18% grey card he describes. They are, however,
more accurate for measuring the amount of light falling on a particular
plane. The opal hemisphere was invented by Gossen (memory may be failing
me here). It was an attempt to make incident meters more relevant in a
real world of multiple light sources and three dimensional subjects.
------------------------------
|