Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
re: Next question
- From: P3D Gabriel Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: re: Next question
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 09:07:29 -0400
Dr. George A. Themelis wrote
>I have tried hard to think of a sound analogy... It turns out that even
>though stereoscopy and stereophony have so many things in common, one
>thing where they differ (and here is the core of the argument) is that
>in stereoscopy the viewing device is of more fundamental importance.
>
>I am not into stereophonics but the closest analogy I can think of is
>if you are asked to perform your piece is a stereophonic studio vs
>in an ordinary room where the acoustics are very different. Then it
>could make a difference on how different pieces sound and how they
>compare to each other... but I doubt that the difference will be as
>important as in the case of stereo vision.
>
How would for the closest analogy stereoviewer=headphones
projector=speakers
I am not sure if this would fit the bill in your discussion.
Gabriel
------------------------------
|