Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re:slide vs neg

  • From: P3D ron labbe <studio3d@xxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re:slide vs neg
  • Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 08:21:39 -0400
A new thread! Sort of~ an interesting subject... George thought I was
serious when I "threatened" to no longer post...

Greg Marshall writes
>

> For other reasons
>I prefer and mostly use transparency films, but for ultimate accutance
>and resolution, negative color film is the clear choice.
>
>

You're opening a can of worms! I don't really know anything about negative
film, so I can't argue. However, isn't it true that most professional
photographers use transparency film for reproduction? I've never heard that
negative film is the most accurate, but it makes sense since it is less
'processed'...

(sorry to those who think this thread is not 3D related... I feel the medium
is part of the art- I usually keep my posts short...)


ron

ron labbe/ studio 3D
30 glendale st maynard, ma 01754
ph 508 897-4221 mailto:ron@xxxxxxxxxxxx

http://www.studio3d.com


------------------------------