Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: slide vs neg


  • From: P3D Eric Goldstein <egoldste@xxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: slide vs neg
  • Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 09:07:36 -0500

ron labbe asks:

> However, isn't it true that most professional
> photographers use transparency film for reproduction? I've never heard that
> negative film is the most accurate, but it makes sense since it is less
> 'processed'...


Ron-

The two reasons for this are the absolute color reference and the
precompression of the tonal range (into something more akin to what
book/magazine/newspaper printing can handle) which reversal film
provides.

I don't know what you mean by "accurate," but color negative film can
record a far greater (up to 6 stops greater) range of contrast than
reversal film. The difficulty is then finding a medium which will
support this dynamic range in viewable positive form... paper prints
don't even come close, and if you're going to wind up with a film
positive you may as well for all intents and purposes start with one!


Eric G.


------------------------------