Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: slide vs neg & Loreo vs. Realist


  • From: P3D Gabriel Jacob <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: slide vs neg & Loreo vs. Realist
  • Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 16:34:39 -0400


>If negative film can record a far greater range of contrast than reversal
>film, then why don't those computer types use negative film then scan the 
>negatives, as if they were positives, then let Photoshop, or a comperable 
>program mathamatically reverse them, thus keeping all the contrast?
>
>Grant

Actually they do! Problem with amateur type scanning of negatives is getting
rid of the orange tint. Don't know what the pros do about that.
There was a good article (pg.42) about "keeping all the contrast" in the
Sept 96 issue of Popular Photography. This was the How To issue, that also
had a short article about how to achieve your first 3-D fuse and make your
own stereographs. This article was discussed here on P3D at the time.

Gabriel 


------------------------------