Re: X and II : pref II - Additional Data?

[P3D Jim Crowell <crowell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 1:31 AM -0700 4/23/97, P3D Jeremy Hinton wrote:
>
>I _think_ the ease of parallel/cross-eyed viewing may be related to
>short and long sight respectively. (due to the relative ease and
>requirement for divorcing accommodation and convergence in each case?)
>
>I would like any evidence on this, so PLEASE.. can folks state
>whether they are short/long(UK), near/far(US) sighted,
>myopic/hypermetropic/presbyopic (pompous 8*) ) ?
>

~7 diopters near-sighted.  I can do both easily now, but originally
wall-eyed was easier...

At 7:48 AM -0700 4/23/97, P3D Dr. George A. Themelis wrote:
>DO I SEE A TRENT HERE?
>
>Those who pick X over II tend to prefer prints over slides?
>
>Please add your preference prints/slides in the poll.

Geez, George, next you'll be wanting to know our Zodiacal signs...  ;-)

Well, back when I started & wall-eyed was easier, I preferred prints & have
since switched pretty much completely to slides.  Am I bucking the trend,
or had I just not discovered my true nature?  :-)

-Jim C.

----------------------
Jim Crowell
Division of Biology
216-76
Caltech
Pasadena, CA
(818) 395-8337
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



------------------------------