Re: 3D and the press

[P3D Dr. George A. Themelis <fj834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>>I think Mr. Lowry is not commenting on 3D in general but 3D as
>>treated by the television networks.
>
>I would like to think this is the case, but there was nothing in the
>article to suggest that is true.  He never said anything about how good,
>useful, or interesting 3-D can be if done right.  He never suggested the
>networks were merely falling short of the 3D quality level he expected.

If "done right" is a big statement... How room is there to do it right in
public TV?  What is the expected 3D quality at TV network level?

-- George Themelis


------------------------------