Re: JPS Windows only Club or Vendor only Club

[P3D Greg Marshall <greg.marshall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jon Gross wrote:

>I agree with the original comments;  Why post in JPS when you could post
>side-by-sides which you could could input into any viewing program,
>including VRex's.  Makes me wonder why they are trying to promote it as
>yet-another "in the best interest of the public" "standard".

I'm way behind in reading the P3D posts, so forgive me if this has
already 
been beaten to death.

Canopus started the JPS format and have always maintained that it should
be simply a JPEG with side-by-side views (no extra header info).  It is 
Received: by bobcat.etsu.edu; id AA14710; Fri, 25 Jul 1997 07:00:30 -0500
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 07:00:30 -0500
Message-Id: <33D900FD.16B6@xxxxxxxxxx>
Errors-To: 3d-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-To: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Originator: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
From: photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: Multiple recipients of list <photo-3d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: PHOTO-3D digest 2196
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment:   The Stereoscopic Image (Photo-3D) Mailing List  
Status:  O

useful to have the .JPS extention to find stereo images quickly, and
this
generally doesn't prohibit it from being opened as a JPEG.  In the worst
case, you can change the extention to .JPG or whatever.  We disagree
with VRex's addition of further information because it increases
complexity
for little benefit.

Greg Marshall, Canopus Corp.





------------------------------