Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Question

  • From: P3D <PresKearns@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Question
  • Date: Thu, 4 Sep 1997 17:27:16 -0400 (EDT)

I have recently received an old TDC Colorist camera with a viewer and a bunch
of slides from the fifties of people I don't know.  I just shot and mounted
my first roll (ektachrome 400). They look great - at least as good as the
kodachrome slides from the 50's. although noticably grainy.  I got all of the
info to do this by reading stuff on this forum and other internet sites.

My question is why does the TDC colorist appear to have the least value of
all of the vintage stereo cameras?  If I were to get a better one, what is so
much better about the Realist 2.8 that makes it 4 times the price?

Thanks


------------------------------