Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: Albion Slide Masks are Back





On Thu, 2 Oct 1997, P3D Greg Erker wrote:

<snip>

>   I like the way the 4 perf Albions do it. They are reduced
> height for Nimslo type cameras with the opening not centered
> relative to the film holding channels. So I can use them to
> cut off more of the top or more of the bottom by using them
> right side up or down. Reduced height 5 perf mounts that worked
> in this way would be perfect (IMO).
> 
>   I don't think removing the channels would make the tooling
> all that much cheaper (maybe 25%?). Dennis might have a guess.

Changing any of the dimensions entails designing a completely new die...
the CAD design time, toolmakers time, EDM time, etc. wouldn't be effected 
by such a time.  Most people don't understand this.  Mucho $$$
 
> >If doing this with aluminum is too expensive, perhaps it is time to look
> >into paper mounts.  Why not Spicer right away?  Because the paper (or thin
> >cardboard) mounts could be mounted in glass.
> 
>   One problem with paper is that they let light pass
> through. So bright parts of the slide that are cropped
> by the window show (glow) thru (in my Dr.T red button
> viewer at least). Black paper would solve that one.
> 
>   No paper would give as perfect an edge as aluminum.
> Even the low fuzz paper that Steve/Joel use.
> 
Ever since the introduction of projected 3D slides, aluminum has stood 
the test of time.  It really is the best material to use.  Paper and 
plastic both have their problems.  I don't mean to start an arguement 
near, search the archives, or better still ask those who do a lot of 
projection.

>   How about plastic? Punch some thin black plastic
> sheet. Use glass or EMDE aluminum frames, or Reel-3d
> blue cardboard foldovers to stiffen and protect the
> one piece/ one sided slide mount. The tooling would
> be cheaper then, I'd guess. But still costly.
> 
> Greg E. (next wish: aluminum MF stereo mounts :)
> 
> 
>
Tooling is expensive, however new dies would probably last for a long, 
long time.  As one toolmaker told me, "Dennis I can make anything if you 
are willing to pay for it."

Dennis Sherwood  emdesher@xxxxxxxxxxx


------------------------------

End of PHOTO-3D Digest 2332
***************************
***************************
 Trouble? Send e-mail to 
 wier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
 To unsubscribe select one of the following,
 place it in the BODY of a message and send it to:
 listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
   unsubscribe photo-3d
   unsubscribe sell-3d
   unsubscribe overland-trails
   unsubscribe icom
 ***************************