No Subject

[r3dzone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ray Zone)]

I thought the members of the list should see my (non guestbook) email to
the 15 year old "bogus 3-D" guy and his response:

> Dear Mr. Dorosky,
>
> I'm sorry, but your "3-D" conversion of flat images is not true,
> stereoscopic 3-D.  You have merely taken a flat image and shifted r/b
> channels.  By doing this you may not be aware that you are giving real 3-D
> a black eye.  But you are not the first to labor under this misconception.
> I am copying a posting made to another neophyte who labored under this
> misconception (recent "emanon" posting) which attempts
> to explain the issue. Feel free to visit my
> website to look at actual anaglyphic 3-D.  I have also appended an
> humongous list of 3-D URL's for your edification.
>
> Regards!
>
> Ray '3-D' Zone

Dorosky's reply:

I am completely aware of that. However, the whole purpose of my page is to serve
customers. Not show off my own 3d stuff. I already know how o make true 3d.

THANX!


* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Ray Zone's Theory of Relative Numbers: 1 + 1 = 3(D)
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Visit Ray's 3-D Website at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~r3dzone
ph 213-662-3831
fx 213-662-3830



------------------------------