P3D Re: C3D (was:Ban everything not specifically 3D?)

["Greg Wageman" <gjw@xxxxxxxxxx>]

From: Dan Shelley <dshelley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


>BUT - if all of these people subscribe to both lists, you lose nothing
and
>gain a lot more... Right now, stereoscopic 3D computer discussions are
>limited on P3D. They will theoretically blossom on D3D or C3D or
whatever.
>This will make everyone happy as there will be a place for thos who
want
>only film 3D. There will be a place for those who want only digital 3D.
And
>everyone else can just join both lists and benefit from having it all.
It's
>a win/win situation in my eyes.


I know, I know, "me too" posts are bad form, but...

Me too!

The way I see this discussion polarizing is that those who feel
(justifiably or not) that they have been stifled on P3D when they've
attempted to provoke a discussion of digital imaging are in favor of the
new list, and those who aren't actively involved in digital imaging are
in favor of the status quo.  Seems to me that the digital folk have more
at stake and ought to win this particular argument.

I've often had the perception that the involved discussions of how to
use software program "X" to convert images to anaglyphs, or the
particular merits of JPS vs. standard JPG images were barely tolerated
on P3D.  Even if that perception is wrong, I think those who want such
discussions can only benefit from having a place where they are not only
tolerated, but encouraged.

My opinions.

     -Greg W. (gjw@xxxxxxxxxx)




------------------------------

End of PHOTO-3D Digest 2644
***************************