Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

P3D Re: Nimslo Modification


  • From: Tom Deering <tmd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: P3D Re: Nimslo Modification
  • Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 21:10:21 -0400 (EDT)


>> If you were to find a way to limit the travel of those two strips, you'd
>> have a smaller aperture.   I could think of a couple ways, but it's up to
>> you and your skills.

>Trouble is, the aperture / shutter blades are in the wrong place. I haven't
>noticed any increase in depth of field as the aperture is reduced - just an
>increase in vignetting as the aperture cuts into the cone of light on it's way
>to the film.

Well, I'm not saying you're wrong, but several people say they get
increased depth of field by putting a little light by the sensor.  I can't
account for this result unless the aperture/shutter is doing it.  There are
no other moving parts in the light path.

I'll build one just for fun, and see if I can equal the "little light"
solution.

Tom



------------------------------