Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Re: PS on "why the 1/30 rule does not work"
- From: Tom Deering <tmd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Re: PS on "why the 1/30 rule does not work"
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1998 15:08:46 -0400 (EDT)
On 8/30/98, Dr. George A. Themelis wrote:
> >How much is "too different?" That's what the formulas try to predict.
>
>No, I am sorry, I disagree Tom. We have already decided how much
>is "too different" We arbitrary set this to 1.2 mm on film deviation.
>This is an assumption. There is no realy physical or experimental
>evidence to support this assumption.
George sometimes just needs to be publicly wrong. I appologize to all the
beginners who have not yet learned to tune this stuff out. In person,
George is a really sweet guy who I enjoyed being with. In person, he backs
down when he's wrong.
If you want to learn about the 1:30 rule from someone who actually
understands it, try http://www.werple.net.au/~kiewavly/bases.html. Note
the graphs near the bottom. Compare the formula that Bercovitz calls "the
most accurate method" (#1), with George's 1:30 rule (#4).
This thread is a waste of my time.
Tom Deering
------------------------------
|