Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

P3D Focus and Depth


  • From: "Andrea Blair" <asblair@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: P3D Focus and Depth
  • Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 12:27:09 PDT

>>>>Eric Goldstein wrote: Andrea asks some interesting questions....<<<<

>>>>OLE HANSEN wrote: I disagree - these questions are not interesting - 
not even provoking.<<<<

Well, Ole, they were provoking enough for you to respond to, otherwise 
you would not have bothered!

>>>>Eric Goldstein wrote: the relationship between focus and the 
perception of depth if one exists....<<<<

>>>>OLE HANSEN wrote: It does indeed - read any tekstbook on 
stereophotography.<<<<

Well, we could do that for any of the topics presented for discussion 
here, couldn't we? Then we could just shut down the list and wouldn't 
have to worry about checking e-mail for the next exciting installation!

>>>>Eric Goldstein wrote: how sharp is sharp....<<<<

>>>>OLE HANSEN wrote: That depends on camera and film.<<<<

I thought sharpness and DOF were related in the particular topic we were 
discussing. We weren't discussing equipment (which will affect sharpness 
in a different way).

>>>>Eric Goldstein wrote: ...a selective focus image that shows depth 
and my answer is that is it irrelevant to me!<<<<

>>>>OLE HANSEN wrote: That is your way of looking at the problem, but 
why do you then take an interest in stereophotography?<<<<

Eric is entitled to express his opinion or preference (or lack of). That 
is what this forum is about. The exchange of ideas, facts, and opinions. 
He's here. He's discussing. Looks like he's interested to me!

>>>>Eric Goldstein wrote: I am a creative director by trade and so 
commission all manner of still, film, video, etc, and am oriented toward 
whether an image is successful or unsuccessful rather than good or 
bad.<<<<

>>>>OLE HANSEN wrote: I am impressed by your status as director, but not 
of your nowledge.<<<<

You don't have to be impressed at all, but you also don't have to be 
rude.

>>>>Eric Goldstein wrote: We are, after all, all colleagues in our 
pursuite of improved skills and teachers to each other in this 
endeavor....<<<<

>>>>OLE HANSEN wrote: I doubt that - You do not seem to have the chance 
to improve your skills as you now all the answers as a creative 
director, teacher and judge.<<<<

I have yet to meet anyone that knows it all, only those who think they 
do, and Eric has never come across as one of those.

>>>>Eric Goldstein wrote: ...and I greatly appreciate the patience and 
respect shown by listmembers to by screwball ideas though they may not 
agree with them, and encourage each of us to return that patience and 
respect in kind.<<<<

>>>>OLE HANSEN wrote: You have brought my patience and respect to an end 
by your posting.<<<<

Obviously, at least in the respect department. What is the problem, Ole? 
This is an open forum for discussion. You don't have to agree with 
everything said. You don't even have to participate in the discussions. 
But why do you insist on being so blunt and rude? I don't recall seeing 
this in your postings in the past. So skip the stuff you don't agree 
with, or the stuff that doesn't *provoke* you, or better yet, start a 
topic you have great interest in sharing or discussing.

Andrea S. Blair
asblair@xxxxxxxxxxx






______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


------------------------------