Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D Analgyph
- From: Dylan The Hippy Wabbit <spacey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D Analgyph
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 11:54:26 +0000 (GMT)
Hi All,
Ray Zone posted the following URL
http://www.ray3dzone.com/plychm1.html
Where he says:-
>With subtractive filtration in the anaglyph, it can be seen that the red
>lens sees the blue image and cancels out the red. The blue sees the red
>and cancels blue. Because a given color filter cancels out the same color
>in the photo or print it is called subtractive.
Can somebody explain that to me? I can't see how a red filter can do
anything other than filter out the blue and transmit the red. It *looks*
red because it doesn't transmit blue. Orright, cyan.
Is it that most of Ray's artwork appears to be dark objects on a light
background, so that what you see is a complementary *shadow* of the
object?
Looking at the upper photo on
"http://home.earthlink.net/~r3dzone/aob.html" supports this hypothesis.
For those who can't go and look immediately, it's a photo of a man playing
some form of wind instrument. He has a light face on a dark background.
The red image is to the left of it's partner. Those parts which are
further away (logically, I don't have funny glasses to hand) are further
to the left than the foreground. Which is what you'd expect of a properly
windowed image if the left eye sees the red image.
Is that description clear?
Have I misunderstood something?
Dave Spacey
_____________________________________________________________________________
Of Bill Gates, "In fact, he's Ernst Stavro Blofeld as played by Woody
Allen." - Charles Shaar Murray
------------------------------
|