P3D Re: Viewing with vs. without lenses

[Bruce Springsteen <bsspringsteen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Greg, whose eyes swing in and out like saloon doors, confessed:

>>Hello, my name is Greg, and I'm a freeviewaholic.

A cautionary tale, if ever there was one.  Talk about decoupling
accommodation and convergence!  This guy's hitting the hard stuff.  He's a
trained professional, don't try it at home.

>>Before I knew it, I was freeviewing "3D Hollywood"

Well, I'm impressed except for that - half the pairs in that book are
cross-viewable pseudo anyway, right? ;-)

But seriously, folks, Tony (I think) mentioned that magnification of
magazine pairs tends to show up the dots in the printing, and it occurred
to me that that's a good argument for printing View Magic pairs in
magazines - large images, no need to cut them out and stuff them in a
Holmes scope or buy a pricey glass lorgnette or freeview at 20 inches as
with full size side-by sides, and no big dots appearing as there's no
magnification at the typical viewing distance - just a very slight
reduction in image size.

You could even do transparency inserts to remove and lay on a light box -
instant "slides" for View Magic-aholics.

Bruce (I'm feeling giddy!  Somebody drive me home.) Springsteen

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com