Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
P3D RE: Loreo/Argus
- From: "Alan Mahon" <alanmahon@xxxxxxxx>
- Subject: P3D RE: Loreo/Argus
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 17:04:20 -0700
This camera like its "ancestor" the Nimslo is a neat and pleasant package.
Even the case is well made and soft to the touch. So 10 out of 10 for the
"feel good factor". It is also innovative in that it places 2 half-frame
images side by side correctly orientated for viewing when negatives are
printed. Although one contributor had difficulties with his processing lab
most automatic equipment should cope and pairs of prints should be returned
to the consumer without difficulty.
If not already obvious from discussions to date it should be realised that
the overall quality of the camera is no better than a disposable camera by
virtue of the facts that the lenses are cheap and simple, exposure is fixed
and so is focus. Indeed those wishing to experiment would probably do
better to buy two disposables and tape or glue them side by side. Taking
pictures only requires pressing the two shutter releases, as best as one
can, simultaneously.
Publications on stereo when discussing the various methods and equipment
which may be used for shooting stereo invariably give beam splitters and
spreaders, the latter more correctly describes the Loreo/Argus, a poor
rating. It is not necessary to go into detail to justify this. As with
most aspects of stereo one only needs to try it, the results speak for
themselves. On the other hand if the user is satisfied, keep shooting.
Unfortunately an inherent fault in these mirror type devices is undesireable
reflections causing light spots and secondary images. This is when the
mirror device is correctly constructed of glass with only four reflective
surfaces. In the interest of economy the Loreo/Argus mirror is moulded in
plastic and silvered all over. Try counting how many surfaces and edges its
mirror has. To keep the mirror clean a piece glass has been placed in
front of the mirror. This has two surfaces and can cause the name badge
immediately behind the glass to be faintly reflected internally. Prints may
look as if the images were shot through a shop window. One should if
possible request processors to deliver prints on matt or satin paper but not
textured or glossy paper.
A marvellous aspect of stereo, for those who love to experiment, is the fact
that there is no shortage of opportunities and the Loreo/Argus cries out to
be modified. The following are worth considering and if undertaken one by
one, with photos taken after each stage to see if they result in an
improvment, could become another publication from the Dr. T bookshop. All
require dismantling of the camera.
1) Remove the glass
2) Paint all but the four essential mirrored surfaces matt black. Also paint
the name badge matt black.
3) Construct a lens hood with a septum on the front of the camera.
4) Disconnect the flash and attach a hot shoe instead or supplement the
flash with a hot shoe for a more powerful flash.
Finally try 200 or 400 ASA Kodak film, avoid cheap own brand film.
Those brave enough have ten years to complete these tasks. By then I'll be
retired and I have promised myself that I will undertake this and finish all
my other projects.
|