Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

Re: [photo-3d] " U.S. Views" folio Q&A


  • From: Linda Nygren <lnygren@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [photo-3d] " U.S. Views" folio Q&A
  • Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 00:25:11 -0500



markaren@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Question 2 : Are we shooting vacation destinations or our own hometown
> sights?
> Each folio member is to shoot their hometown locale, or nearest major
> city. Vacation shots and destinations away from your home town cannot be
> included. For example, since I live in Pittsburgh, I cannot include
> vacation shots from Gettysburg, a neighboring famous locale. We would
> require the images be within the surrounding area of your hometown, and
> allow another photographer from the Gettysburg area to cover that
> territory. In fact, I'm proposing that a limit of 2 photographers be
> allowed to contribute within a determined radius of a city.
> So the first 2 early signees can claim " Detroit" for example, since an
> active stereo club meets there, several folks may wish to join. But the
> first 2 signing up would have the exclusive of the Detroit area. Others
> would have to wait for the next available opening for this area. Of
> course if the folio becomes large enough, more folks would be needed in
> that locale.

> > Just cities, or parks/rural areas etc? Is the
> > idea that the views should be somewhat geographically or architecturally
> > distinctive, potentially identifiable to a particular city or area?


I am still confused about whether the emphasis is on cities and towns,
buildings, architecture etc, to the exclusion of natural features, rural
subjects etc. Or is it pretty open as long as you are within the "area",
however that is defined?  -Linda