Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D

Notice
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
<-- Date Index --> <-- Thread Index --> [Author Index]

[photo-3d] Re:3D and stereo vocabulary


  • From: Michael Hodsdon <mike3d@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [photo-3d] Re:3D and stereo vocabulary
  • Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 17:11:51 -0700

Tom Deering wrote:
>I work with a couple 3D modeling 
>software companies, and often talk with those people about using 3D 
>(their meaning) software to generate 3D (my meaning) pictures, the 
>confusion is constant.

I found this quote the other day and thought of this thread.
 Apparently someone did a study where they modeled several
people's bodies in 3D.
When asked to choose their own body, almost everyone chose a
thinner
model. 
Professor Stephen Gray at Nottingham-Trent University said,
"There is a colossal difference in a body viewed on a
  highly accurate, rotatable three-dimensional scan
  compared to the two-dimensional image people are used
  to seeing in their mirrors. It was an enlightening,
perhaps
  even humbling, experience." 
http://www.the-times.co.uk/news/pages/tim/2000/06/15/timnwsnws02016.html

A doubly good example of the confusion mentioned.
 The professor was talking about a 2D image
on a computer monitor, and the image in a mirror is stereo!
=)
Mike Hodsdon

-- 
               
                   Grab your red/blue or red/green 
                      3-D glasses and check out
                Mike's Optically Stimulating Wonderland!
                       (red lens = left eye)

                  http://members.xoom.com/3dmike1/