Mailinglist Archives:
Infrared
Panorama
Photo-3D
Tech-3D
Sell-3D
MF3D
|
|
Notice |
This mailinglist archive is frozen since May 2001, i.e. it will stay online but will not be updated.
|
|
[photo-3d] Re:3D and stereo vocabulary
- From: Michael Hodsdon <mike3d@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [photo-3d] Re:3D and stereo vocabulary
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 17:11:51 -0700
Tom Deering wrote:
>I work with a couple 3D modeling
>software companies, and often talk with those people about using 3D
>(their meaning) software to generate 3D (my meaning) pictures, the
>confusion is constant.
I found this quote the other day and thought of this thread.
Apparently someone did a study where they modeled several
people's bodies in 3D.
When asked to choose their own body, almost everyone chose a
thinner
model.
Professor Stephen Gray at Nottingham-Trent University said,
"There is a colossal difference in a body viewed on a
highly accurate, rotatable three-dimensional scan
compared to the two-dimensional image people are used
to seeing in their mirrors. It was an enlightening,
perhaps
even humbling, experience."
http://www.the-times.co.uk/news/pages/tim/2000/06/15/timnwsnws02016.html
A doubly good example of the confusion mentioned.
The professor was talking about a 2D image
on a computer monitor, and the image in a mirror is stereo!
=)
Mike Hodsdon
--
Grab your red/blue or red/green
3-D glasses and check out
Mike's Optically Stimulating Wonderland!
(red lens = left eye)
http://members.xoom.com/3dmike1/
|